Why not? Why is Robertson allowed so many bad games when he cost us THREE picks, but Brick gets fried for one bad game?
D'brick is better, but he's had more than 1 bad game this year. The Mario Williams sack which nearly re-dislocated Chad's shoulder a few weeks ago was a play where D'Brick whiffed 1-on-1 vs. super Mario.
Except that Robertson hasnt had a bad game in about 5 weeks....in fact, he's been one of our better players on defense. Where were you when all of this was being discussed? Oh yeah, the team was winning so you were nowhere to be found on the subject. This guy is your personal punching bag after every jet loss, regardless of how he plays. So go ahead..lets hear your rant about the 3 picks we gave up for him AGAIN.
Dewayne robertson is a fat loser, but that really had very little to do with the Jets losing today...fatboy could have had 10 sacks and we still would have lost. no problem with labelling him a BUST though. he's an overpaid stiff.
4th ranked rush defense in 2004. Robertson has played very well the last few weeks. It makes you look like an even bigger moron than usual when you post stuff like this.
Dude, you're turning into a troll with this shit. Naturally, you show up after a loss. Where were you the other day when there was a load of praise heaped on the guy? Invisible, naturally.
Why dont you first tell us where you were the past 4 weeks when everyone including many football experts were highlighting D robs recent improvements and quality play? Did you dissapear b/c the team was winning? Or b/c he was playing well? It's pretty obvious to anyone who posts on TGG that D rob is your punching bag after losses REGARDLESS of how he performs. You will never gt over the 3 picks they gave up for him..and therefore are completely oblivious to his actual worth to this team. It's a shame too..b/c other than this topic..you are a very good poster.
