I think the Russians, the Syrians and the Turks are doing a bang up job. Too bad for the Kurds though. I think Trump is or was backing them right? They started to lose and now knowing Trump, he'll disown them since he never, EVER, takes blame for any failure.
ISIS existted before Obama was even president. Holy shit you'll buy anything that giant Cheetoh will say. What is Trump doing (besides offing special forces members at an absurd rate) that Obama didn't do? The fight against ISIS started with Obama starting the fight against them. Trump is just letting the military continue what Obama directed them to do.
ISIS became huge under Obama's watch when he pulled out of Iraq early despite the warning from disphit Bush that it would create a huge vacuum for an ISIS to fill. They thrived under his watch. Trump changed the pussy rules of engagement Barry instated. Democrats cried about how he was a big dumb meanie for it. Now ISIS is all but dead. Are you sick of all this winning yet?
The ONLY way to stay in Iraq at the time was to overthrow the government we had installed. There would have been no other option. Americans didn't want to be there. Iraq didn't want us to be there. The only thing we could continue to do there is let Americans die for people who don't want us there. We were already fucking ISIS up before Trump became president. What direct contribution can you actually pinpoint to Trump having given to the fight against ISIS besides him talking shit on Twitter?
panic? lmao Believe me, I am not in the slightest bit worried about today's news. Even if something were a legit threat to Trump being president, which today's news clearly is not, I wouldn't give a fuck. Next in line is Pence, not Clinton, not Bernie. I never wanted Trump in the first place so it's no skin off my back so long as we aren't turning left. I voted for him and wanted him to win over Clinton, but he wasn't my R choice at all. Weak ass indictment has nothing to do with Trump or his campaign.
No, saying events that happened at the same time of his presidency does not mean it was a direct contribution.
Apparently you're not very good with reading, so this probably won't help either. Your poor reading comprehension does explain why you seem to think the indictment is a huge deal for Trump and his campaign though. Once again, he's changed the rules of engagement. https://www.militarytimes.com/news/...-i-m-giving-the-military-total-authorization/ https://www.militarytimes.com/news/...-rules-of-engagement-for-mosul-fight-in-iraq/ https://www.militarytimes.com/flashpoints/2017/10/03/mattis-reveals-new-rules-of-engagement/ https://www.nytimes.com/2017/04/05/us/politics/rules-of-engagement-military-force-mattis.html http://www.foxnews.com/us/2017/10/0...-troops-in-afghanistan-to-defeat-taliban.html
So let's go over those articles. We launched a MOAB. Cool. And what exactly did it accomplish? We didn't gain territory from it. Killed some people but so what? We've killed just as many with smaller bombs and drones. #2 Doesn't mention anything about Trump or that he had any input whatsoever. Doubtful it'd even make it that high. #3 Cool, we can now fire on people without identifying them as combatants or hazards of blowing a building to hell without considering who is in there. That's a great idea...not. #4 Same as #3, faster results at the expense of more civilian deaths. #5 Same thing. All in all, we can now try to kill try to kill more bad guys at the expense of killing more civilians.
