No. What you've described is a huge exaggeration on both ends, but even so, no. But I'm not inclined to credit random conspiracy theories over any simpler explanation. They appeal to bitter disaffected paranoiacs who want to latch onto anything that easily explains the complicated matrix of events that actually produce the events that have an effect on their life, which they have little or no control over. Rather than admit that, they play the victim and blame someone or something else. See what I did there? But just for fun. Who is George Soros donating money to and why? What's in it for him? I don't spend all day cruising the internet for conspiracy websites, so I'm totally ignorant of all this. I'll give you probs if I think you are right.
Ok, then maybe you can answer this, because I've asked a couple of times and no one has answers. If it's a fact that cops kill more than double the amount of whites per year ... Regardless of population , crime rate or any other aspects... You would also think that there is more of a percentage of "unjustified" shootings in that crowd. Why is it that it is never addressed in the media, no public outcry, demonstrations, riots, grieving mothers on tv etc? Never. Why is it that the media is force feeding it to one specific group with an anticipated reaction?
Your entire post is a conspiracy theory. Your link contained nothing from the Charlotte Police Department or any other governmental agency. If you are so bad at reading for content you should probably refrain from broadcasting that on message boards.
Really? What part is conspiracy theory ? Cnn reported on the 1st night live that rioters were attacking cars on the freeway as well as attacking people and truck drivers at a Walmart. It's been well documented that the same thing happened in Milwaukee. What the fuck is the difference if a police spokesman reported 70% of the arrested rioters were from out of state? That's what the fuck a police spokesman is supposed to do, that's where the info comes from. You can easily look it up yourself, I don't have to post links . If the fact that I did t post a link in my post when you can easily find it yourself is your argument... Then... If you really need it presented to you , I will do it when I get home and am front of my computer
Are you really that thick? NO POLICE SPOKESMAN MADE SUCH A CLAIM! But you found something on the internet and posted, because, you know, it was on the internet. "Bon Jour!"
I don't know. Maybe because white people are genetically predisposed to remain calm, unless they are in law enforcement. Now answer my question without changing the subject.
https://www.google.com/amp/www.brei...arrested-rioters-state-ids/amp/?client=safari do me a favor tool box, just put in your search browser"police say 70% of rioters in Charlotte arrested from out of state" you will see that it was said by the Charlotte fraternal order of police on cnn interview. Pick whatever source you want from the 2 plus pages
Seriously? So if my kid is shot in cold blood I'll shut my mouth because I'm white? That's not an answer to that question at all, and since the odds day there should me many more "unjustified " shooting of whites, I want to know why not even one is on the tip of anyone's tongue. What's your question?
Yea...that guy walked the 70% statement back this morning as speculation. People dying, everyone's nerves are on edge, it's stupid to publicly speculate.
I didn't see that this am; but I'm not sure how you retract it if it was based on the ids of arrested
On Friday, Wather[sic] admitted his comments were inaccurate and merely based on speculation. “I didn’t quote facts,” Walther, told the Observer on Friday. “It’s speculation. That’s all it was.” http://www.businessinsider.com/i-di...ial-walks-back-statement-on-protesters-2016-9
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Soros This is the wiki def of who he is. It can be seen as how ever people choose. But people of that wealth maneuvering social groups imo serves an elitist political agenda . Now how about a serious response to what I asked. fron anyone
That's quite a blunder then. Because he stated that it was based on who was being arrested . Regardless, that just makes Charlotte look worse if it was their own citizens. The complaint of outside agitators has been a complaint of pro blm community organizers since Ferguson.
So based on his Wikipedia profile you believe he's bankrolling the media coverage of these controversies? I need to look into this but it seems a little pie I the sky to me.
Keith Lamont Scott A public records search shows that Scott was convicted in April 2004 of a misdemeanor assault with a deadly weapon charge in Mecklenburg County. Other charges stemming from that date were dismissed: felony assault with a deadly weapon with intent to kill, and misdemeanors assault on a child under 12, assault on a female and communicating threats. In April 2015 in Gaston County Court, Scott was found guilty of driving while intoxicated. In 1992, Scott was charged in Charleston County, S.C., with several different crimes on different dates, including carrying a concealed weapon (not a gun), simple assault and contributing to the delinquency of a minor. He pleaded guilty to all charges. Scott also was charged with aggravated assault in 1992 and assault with intent to kill in 1995. Both charges were reduced, but the disposition of the cases is unclear. According to Bexar County, Texas, records, Scott was sentenced in March 2005 to 15 months in a state jail for evading arrest. In July of that year, records show, he was sentenced to seven years in prison on a conviction of aggravated assault with a deadly weapon. A Texas Department of Criminal Justice spokesman said Scott completed his sentence and was released from prison in 2011. The cops said he was smoking pot and had a gun at the time they shot and killed him. So, what we have here is a lifelong thug who was committing at least two crimes at the time he got shot and killed - smoking marijuana and possessing a firearm despite being not allowed to do so, as he was a convicted felon. Ah, and he also had 7 kids - quite an example for his kids this guy was....
that's the way youre going to see it because you don't believe in conspiracies. that's fine. lust for power is human nature and wealth of his magnitude puts him in the position to pull a lot of strings. elitists never give a rats ass about the oppressed or anybody else unless they seek to maneuver them. elitists have made it no secret over the course of history that they want the world to be a more controlled environment. he as well as others like Rockefeller have put their intentions in writing. But if you see it as pie in the sky,thats fine. But you don't see the absence of attention on any at all "unjustified" shooting of whites,and the narrative that it only happens to one race when stats prove other wise as a little pie in the sky also? There is seriously something missing here. as far as wiki,its the 1st thing I pulled up on him in google. his involvement in manipulating social movement has been known for a long time. it will never be questioned by those he moves when he is writing them checks
Pretty weak, buddy. Nothing is anybody's fault because of George Soros. And you absolutely cannot tolerate when the brothers are complaining about their lot in life.
