Lol, you're a bit delusional. Marshall/Decker are easily top 5. You could argue Top 3. And that's not "just based on stats". Lmao @ "on potential". Get out of here.
"Potential" is a word usually only revoked around here when defending Geno Smith, which tells you everything you need to know about the word
Lmao! Watkins and Harvin. Oh boy. Watkins can't stay on the field without getting hurt and Harvin is a child compared to Marshall. I think Rex is rubbing off on you Bills fans lol
lmao why are you even here? Harvin & Watkins?? lmaooooooo!!! they don't even play. Honestly Marshall and Decker might just be the 1st and 2nd best WR's in the division period. Edelman's good but there's a shit load of players you can plug in his role and they'll be even more impactful.
So lol at this thread even though its legit based on the only quantifiable way to prove it. Cool story bro.
I thought this thread was kinda dumb until you came in here like tommy boy mumbling and stuttering. Now it's amusing. What else would this thread be about other than "stats for this season", numbnuts? And please, keep telling us new ways to parse the data to make it look like the bills WR's are anything other than mediocre, homer. "if you hold your head sideways and squint she's almost a really pretty girl" You are clown shoes.
I haven't read this thread so this opinion has probably already been stated but if you took all the two 2 WR combos and had the same QB throwing to them I would have to think Marshall and Decker would rank pretty high up on that list. Top 3? Not so sure about that. But definitely top 10 and maybe even top 5.
hahaha if you have to start your post with a disclaimer about ignoring reality and asking people to join your own personal fantasy land then you know you are trying hard to make a fucked up point.
Decker and Marshall make a great combo. Decker is underrated in this league. He doesn't make the flashy deep reception or talk shit about himself some people don't put him up there with the guys who do.... Decker just shows up to work and does his job. Who cares if he's "a no.1." or "a no. 2" all I see is a solid, dependable WR who happens to be exceptional when the team gets into the red zone
to me Calvin|Tate is the best talent wise Thomas | Sanders is right there, and probably the best balance on field duo Dez | williams would be next for me when dez is healthy then Jones | white and green | Jones id probably have marshall | Decker right after that, although balance wise while marshall isnt as good as green/julio/dez id say decker is better then the #2's on those teams. certainly top 5-7 duo, depending how you value top end talent over balanced duo
1. Thomas/Sanders - Denver 2. Decker/Marshall - NYJ 3. Johnson/Tate - Det Imagine Geno or Fitz throwing to Antonio Brown last year and this year....you think he's going to have the same stats? Cobb and Nelson on this year's Jets, are you as confident as you are with Decker and Marshall? Hell no. If we traded Decker and Marshall to Green Bay, I'd fly to Vegas and put a lot of money on GB winning the SB. We have a top 5 WR, and a top 15 WR. Both are #1. People like to deny Decker as a #1, yet he produced 900 yards with Geno during a year with nagging injuries, and would be a perennial 1400 yard receiver with a top 5 QB throwing to him.
I'm assuming this is a troll. If not, then congrats on the dumbest post on this forums. You don't know football.
you know those things where people like to add a phrase to something or replace a part of a title of something for the lulz? for example, some people like to add "in bed" to the end of fortune cookies or replace one word in a movie title with "shit" or whatever. We'd get more out of doing that with your posts by liberally replacing the entire thing, no matter what it is, with "I stroke myself while reading tgg" than to read the actual text. It's almost certainly more accurate than the actual text too.