I have a question and thought this would be a good pre-season topic to "jaw" over. I've been paying close attention to that mess down in Philadelphia...and the more I read the more I have a feeling that the loon that is Chip Kelly could very well keep Tebow and his versatility over a guy like Matt Barkley. I mean...he wouldn't keep FOUR QB's on his roster...now would he? Having mused all that...would anyone be opposed to bringing in a guy like Barkley to sit behind Fitz and ahead of Petty? Just thought this would be an interesting "turn" of events. We most certainly would have first dibs on the waiver wire...or close to it I think. Mull away! Lord knows I agree with every person out there that feels Geno is DONE on the Jets.
not a fan of Barkley at all. anyone that could be considered 'a poor mans Sanchez'................ooooof
Your poll question and answers don't correspond. They should be yes, no, maybe, not different players names. But to answer the question, no, no way I'd want Barkley. He's awful.
That's what I'm thinking too. If he can get someone who has, at least, been in a camp it would be something. I'm really not liking what I'm seeing from "everyone else" when you consider they've been looking at the hurt Flynn and guys like Grossman. Hell, I'd take Matt Simms over either of those two...at least he is physically ready to take a snap. I don't know...if I'm Mac I'm paying VERY close attention to a couple of QB competitions around the league.
Honestly it couldn't hurt.....but last I heard is they tried to trade him to Miami but it fell through.....Apparently they are still trying to trade him first
Would be awesome to see what's his name make 300 threads about why Tebow shouldn't throw in his parking lot and can't take his shirt off.
