Who said anything about vet minimum? If you would actually read or try and comprehend what I said, you would see I wrote "modest" contract compared to what he would get. That doesn't necessarily mean a vet min contract one can infer that in this case it would just mean a contract at a discount since the player being signed needs to re-establish himself or "PROVE" that he deserves his full value when he signs his next contract. CASE CLOSED you cant argue with that unless you're a complete fckin dumbaz
Cut the nonsense. Hahahaaa you said on a 1 year deal "at such a discount" for "depth". He made $13.1 million last year without even playing--what "such a discount" is he going to play for? And he'd immediately be one of our best players and starters--he's not going somewhere to be a backup for depth. Besides, what "prove it" deal do you think Drew Rosenhaus going to let him sign? He's not giving anyone a sweetheart deal to prove anything. Least of all the Jets. And "fckin dumbaz"? What's with that? You posted another in a long line of stupid Jet fan threads suggesting we try to sign superbly talented yet flawed players to 1 year deals for small money. Btw, using cap locks does not bolster your opinion nor close the case. _
I used the caps lock specifically for you. I have identified YOU as the idiot so my hope was that with the caps lock you would possibly be able to comprehend my point and not just read over it like you have previously done. Unfortunately, as I expected, my efforts were in vain as you continue to fail to understand the point and stubbornly stick to your original thought. I am done here I have already wasted 2 minutes with this complete retard...
Yup, Greg Hardy is going to sign a 1 year deal as a backup for short money so he can "prove" he can stay clean off the field. That's what Drew Rosenhaus does--he tries to get his players as little money and years as he can in the hopes of striking it rich in the future. Rosenhaus is a HUGE Jet fan and will do anything to help us out over the interests of his players. So naive some of these youngters. Maybe Adrian Peterson will restructure and come play for us on a 1 year deal for short money to back up Ivory. Just to prove he's no longer whipping his kid. I'm pretty sure AP is a Jet fan. _
So now you are backtracking on your earlier naive suggestion. 1 year deal. For depth. At such a discount. My niece is mentally retarded. Don't use that slur again jackass. _
For the last time, retard, at a discount does not necessarily mean signing for a minimum contract. It means being able to sign him for less then what he usually makes considering he's been suspended for half the season. And the reason he'd be depth is because he's gonna be out for half the season and he'd basically be depth for us once he's back. Basic reading comprehension retard.
Nice backtracking. 1 year deal. Your literal words. Not happening. At "such a discount" (your literal words)--that means sizeable--if he signs for $8-$9 mill a year, that's not modest--that's real $$. And he's not DEPTH (your literal words) if he's suspended because he can't play. And the second he comes off of suspension he's immediately on the field regardless if we're 100% healthy or not. I can read fine, you're just a naive poster and you don't know what you're saying. But enjoy your vacation. _
You cant ignore the fact that PR is a significant aspect of the business when arguing for the signing from a business perspective. Helping a team win doesn't equate to it being good from a business standpoint.
Yes. Last year he made $13.1 million. This year $13 million. That $100k discount is "prove it" money. _
