Unless they have to get rid of Sanchez bc of salary cap constraints, they should just keep him. He is the best back up/competition for Geno that they have at this point. As for Vick .... He would just be a mega distraction for Geno, and cause a "circus" like environment. Geno doesnt need to be looking over his shoulder at Vick during this stage of his development.
That's cool, certainly your choice to make. I can't read the idiocy. I was about to blow a gasket and am sure would have gotten myself banned if I didnt' just put about 10 ppl on ignore.
So what about this guy? Could be just banned lonestarlady/sg3/Mitch Dumstein. You putting this newbie on ignore? _
LOL. This guy put me on ignore because I made a post about Revis Christ coming again and saving us all. Apparently he's really mad bro.
Do you have a source for that? Apparently that's critical for some posters here when discussing rumors. _
http://espn.go.com/nfl/story/_/id/1...-plan-target-matt-schaub-mark-sanchez-qbs-cut It doesn't say they'd trade for him, but I say the Jets should sign Schaub which will make them desperate for Mark. Then we claim we need him to be our starter and they overpay!
I agree with the Schaub theory. And thanks for the link. Call me silly but a bylined ESPN article gets more credence from me than a vague post by Wally Interweb.
"Google" he says in post six thousand two hundred forty-five in this topic alone. Who the hell has time? Do you really not see the difference between something bylined on ESPN and an anonymous poster here? I somehow believe that ESPN has more access to the inner workings of an NFL front office than I do...or soxxx...or you.
