so Andrew Luck can shred the Seahawks with only one receiver but Peyton can't? This game will come down to tackling and special teams.
again, you are an imbecile because you can't even grasp a simple concept when it is explained to you. no, I never said it was better to have Sanchez for 10 years than Peyton Manning for 4. try again. or are actually trying to reinforce what I have said about you?
And your the immature one that has to launch verbal attacks at me because you are upset I brought a post up from a couple years ago, while you are the one who is constantly bringing up crap from 2010. Did I hurt your ego when I posted that quote? is that why you seem so bothered? Get over yourself.....
This is what you said buddy: And this is your explanation: Your a fool, you dont even know what you are saying. But go ahead, Quote this post, call me names, act immature, etc. If it makes you feel better and helps you justify that you were actually wrong about something for once in your life then so be it.
what am I bringing up from 2010? I have called you on what you have posted in this thread. if you are bringing up stuff from 2010 in this thread that doesn't equate to my dragging up old posts. hopefully third time is the charm in explaining something extremely simple. but I doubt it. you see, there is a very basic word you are missing. it is "perhaps." the simple inclusion of the word "perhaps," inherently reflects I am not making a declaration that having Sanchez is better, it is stating having Sanchez would be better if the development occurred. there are two factors in that sentence that have to be addressed together, you can't simply throw one away and only address the other. but, obviously, that is far too complex for you, and your need to simplify it is reflective of the fact that an argument with more than one element is too complex for you. and please don't attempt to deflect that criticism of you as immaturity on my part. at this point it is simply accurate. and to help you grasp the actual context, here is a reminder of the actual exchange in which that post was made in response to: http://www.theganggreen.com/forums/showpost.php?p=2434609&postcount=152
So I am going to my first Super Bowl and the official NFL tailgate party with my fiance...Got this through my work with the league. Quite excited, I'll be sitting in the 200's. Will be freezing my ass off, but am excited.
Good for you. Enjoy the game and share your experience please How much did you end up paying if you don't mind?
Got these through my work with the league...I would not pay for any Super Bowl except the one the Jets play in and lets be honest the money spent for these tickets and passes are better served elsewhere...Btw, I am told the tailgate passes are worth more then the tickets...Should be cool, I either get to see the greatest QB win a SB or Seattle win its first. Have no problem with either one and the fiance gets to enjoy Bruno Mars lol
congrats and have fun but Montana or Brady don't have a chance to win Sunday. You either get to see the 6th-10th best QB(6th if he wins, 10th or lower if he loses- depending upon how he loses) or Seattle get their first win.
So if Peyton throws for 400 yards and 4td's with no turnovers but loses, he's not a top 10 QB of all time. Good grief you are a weird guy. Peyton's legacy is secure. He's a first ballot HOF'er and a top 3 QB of the modern era even if Denver loses 50-0 on Sunday.
it means he had a great game(probably, if they are down big and he is adding garbage time #s that won't impress me). when you say modern era what are you referring to? since '98? definitely top 3, he's a very confortable #2.
