Muck Sanchez has always been total dog shit. Last year's miserable performance was a foregone conclusion. Muck should have been cut after 2011. He will likewise be an embarrassment this year, and the same junc and excuses will be trotted out again in a lame attempt to defend him(stats dont matter, we had injuries, the receivers sucked, he cant be bad because he won some playoff games). If you haven't already come to the definitive conclusion that Muck is completely worthless as a qb, no amount of objectively terrible play will ever convince you.
You know it's certainly possible that Mark Sanchez is a bad quarterback who happened to win 4 playoff games.
This is my favorite BrayBray quote- "I would like to apologize to the Jets family and my fans for my emotional outburst. Mark is a friend and former teammate, who I wholeheartedly support. Nonetheless, I have disrespected and insulted an administration that I have the utmost respect for." Wide receivers are known to be fair & balanced. I do miss him though.
Arguing with Junc is like pissing up a rope. You see a rope hanging there, and you say "Hey look, there's a rope. I'm gonna piss up it." So you piss up the rope, and you think "Well that wasn't hard at all!"..... ...till you look down while zipping up your fly, and you realize your sneakers are soaked with piss.
:rofl: yes, indeed. Competition at every spot. I understand that Wilson, is going to push Cro, to start opposite Milliner. The upshot is, Cro will still be awesome in the slot.
I don't weigh 4 playoff game wins more than 4 seasons of overall bad play. Romo has yet to do anything significant in the playoffs, but there isn't anyone in the world who thinks Sanchez is the better QB.
dude tony romo is a running joke throughout the league the guy single-handedly lost how many playoff games? to say he has yet to do anything significant in the playoffs is being WAYYYY nice the guys an embarrassment under pressure
:rofl: If you had to win one game you'd take Homo? :rofl2: Romo has had barber,jones, Witten,Bryant, austin, Jason garrets offense. And Sanchez has playoff wons. Go buy a fucking cowboys jersey. In Pink. P.S. remind me again, how the Jets beat the Cowboys? Right, Homo threw the pick..
Id rather have a guy you know has the skills as a passer who's played badly in the playoffs than a guy who's played badly in a large sample and won 4 playoff games as a game manager early in his career, on good teams. Romo has a hell of a better shot of getting his shit together on the "big stage" than Sanchez becoming a Romo level passer over a 16 game season.
The thing is, we want him making plays that help put us in position to win the game and then making plays to win the game. We don't just want him making a play in a game that was kept close most of the game regardless of his play or because of his play. It's something he has rarely done in his career, put together a great game. He just never has been that consistent. There's the NE playoff game, the HOU game, and maybe that's it where he was great all game. Individually judging Sanchez as a QB (taking out team record), you see a real bad QB. Add in team accomplishments, you see a better QB. It's important what you put the emphasis on. I personally think we CAN win with Sanchez but that's mostly because we give Sanchez high percentage throws and hide him from being the focal point of our offense over 16 games. I think we can more with a better QB. That's too far the other direction. In 2009 it could be argued we could have won and even done better in the regular season with 15 other QBs at least. In 2010, probably 10-15 QBs could have helped. We never won in spite of Sanchez, in fact when Sanchez plays terrible the team can rarely overcome it (BAL, ATL, BUF, NO, etc). It amazes me how people think being good or bad is a static thing. Players, GMs, coaches change for better or for worse. While Tanny was a good GM, he put together too many bad decisions and hence he went from good to bad. It isn't a static thing. I mean this is why finding a consistently great QB is amazing to have. It's rare, or a consistently great coach or consistently well run organization. It's tough to find Good, right now only positive stuff should come from all the Jets mouths. Once they feel where the HC leaning in TC, they should start leaning that way. No way to take shots at Mark or Geno or any QB right now, just be positive.
not in a million years dude you are talking crazy here. romo has played on way better/more talented teams than mark sanchez has. and dont forget about his security blanket jason witten... 4 playoff wins is 4 playoff wins. but on the flip side tony romo didnt just not win in the playoffs, he curled up and died
As if Sanchez hasn't done this over the course of the last two seasons. As much as choking exists, its something that athletes can overcome. It happens all the time. Was Favre a choker? Steve Young? Dirk Nowitzki? Lebron? Hell even Arod put it together for an entire postseason. Fans overrate the big made for tv moments, both good and bad, when the most important aspect of being a good player is doing it over the course of an entire season, for multiple seasons...especially from the QB. Being overall bad, which Sanchez is...there's no fixing that.
has sanchez ever had a receiver (let alone last year) as good as the dudes tony romo was throwing to? add to that the insanely high cliff that his play dives off of when playoff time comes, no sanchez has never done anything like that.
well then i guess theres nothing really left for us to talk about now is there? didnt realize i was arguing with one of those. probably should have
so why then are you not complaining about tony romos fumbles? ball security aint that dudes middle name if you catch my drift... oh whatever im done here
