Welcome 2013 1st Round Pick DT Sheldon Richardson

Discussion in 'New York Jets' started by Murrell2878, Apr 25, 2013.

  1. BakerMaker

    BakerMaker Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2006
    Messages:
    7,351
    Likes Received:
    664
    Eifert would have been fine there.

    Hopefully Sheldon Richardson can be Justin Smith 2.0....I am just trying to be optimistic.
     
  2. SienaSaints

    SienaSaints Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2010
    Messages:
    2,108
    Likes Received:
    148
    They have to be switching to a 4-3 where the pash rush comes from the edge of the line.
     
  3. PinPointPenning10

    PinPointPenning10 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 12, 2004
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    156
    With no NFL-caliber starter at SS, RG, TE, or ROLB, we took two positions where we already had capable starters in Wilson and Ellis, respectively. And Richardson doesn't even fit the system. This is mind-boggling. Completely mind-boggling.
     
  4. ILL-AL

    ILL-AL Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2002
    Messages:
    667
    Likes Received:
    29
    Wasnt Kyle Wilson best CB in the draft? lol
     
  5. ATL-JET

    ATL-JET Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2002
    Messages:
    2,543
    Likes Received:
    5
    You all DO know we have 6 more picks in a draft DEEP with WRs, OL RBs and TEs correct?

    Although I'm NOT thrilled with the Richardson pick, I am NOT at all enthralled with Garray or Ellis at the NT/DT position.

    Looking at the film, the kid is a BEAST.

    I like the Milliner pick personally. NO, he's NOT Revis, but who is besides Revis?

    Let's just see what rounds 2 - 7 bring us before we all lose it.

    No I'm not Sunshiner, but I'm saying, let's all just chill for a second and see how the rest of the draft goes before we put the cart before the horse.
     
  6. Matt4776

    Matt4776 Active Member

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2010
    Messages:
    841
    Likes Received:
    128
    If we switch to a 4-3/46, what do we line up with?

    Coples-Richardson-Ellis-Wilkerson?

    Can Coples and Wilk play the outside? I feel they're both better fits on the inside.

    I really don't get this pick.
     
  7. HardHitta

    HardHitta Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2007
    Messages:
    6,174
    Likes Received:
    234
    Should have been a pass rusher and it should of been Jarvis Jones.

    Motherfuckers.
     
  8. mikey

    mikey Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2013
    Messages:
    173
    Likes Received:
    34
    Bottom line is there are so many needs that need to be addressed we could have put names in a hat, picked, and improved. I'm good with these picks because they address needs. We messed up by not selecting Warmack, but who saw all the other OTs getting picked that high? In the end, these are all still guys we haven't seen play pro ball and we don't know how it's going to pan out. Keep the faith guys.
     
  9. PinPointPenning10

    PinPointPenning10 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 12, 2004
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    156
    We already have 2 potential Justin Smiths!
     
  10. plasticsloth

    plasticsloth Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2006
    Messages:
    1,741
    Likes Received:
    126
    Two SEC players. Clearly the Jets wanted players going up against the top competition. Can't say I fault them on that logic. Also must be some issues with Floyd as he's plummeting. Wondering how he projects as a NT. Same build as Star who many would have preferred. I trust Rex on DL. It's Milliner over Warmack that bothers me. Hopefully we can get Kyle Long or Justin Pugh in the second
     
  11. dmw

    dmw Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2010
    Messages:
    2,879
    Likes Received:
    2,454
    I agree. When it comes to defense, Rex knows how to evaluate players. If there were players that the Jets wanted, they were already selected b4 the Jets picked.
     
  12. allencjets

    allencjets New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2013
    Messages:
    26
    Likes Received:
    14
    I don't understand what everyone is so upset about, we still have plenty of picks to address offense. I don't see this as much of a big deal.
     
  13. dmw

    dmw Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2010
    Messages:
    2,879
    Likes Received:
    2,454
    The Sack Exchange

    Maybe they're recreating the sack exchange?
     
  14. soh_vet

    soh_vet Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2005
    Messages:
    1,123
    Likes Received:
    206
    What are you talking about? We have Calvin Pace #crying



    Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I747 using Tapatalk 2
     
  15. yanks9596

    yanks9596 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2006
    Messages:
    616
    Likes Received:
    262
    Jets will officially be unwatchable in 2013. Team has improved in no meaningful way, and there is absolutely NOTHING to be excited about on the offensive side of the ball. Seriously, Idzik... WTF are you doing.
     
  16. tank75

    tank75 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2010
    Messages:
    1,928
    Likes Received:
    57
    one of his downsides is that he isnt as strong against the double team, but with wilk and coples hes not likely to see many of those

    everything i can find about him talks about his effort, so im gonna assume that he will work hard for the team and i definitely like that. good attitude to bring into the locker room

    young and quick on d, even our line haha
     
  17. rockyusmc2003

    rockyusmc2003 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2005
    Messages:
    3,197
    Likes Received:
    1,533
    Let's hope there 4 can dominate inside and they can label them The CREW

    Coples, Richardson, Ellis, Wilkerson
     
  18. Sanchize0829

    Sanchize0829 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 13, 2010
    Messages:
    1,740
    Likes Received:
    188
    I really don't have a problem with picking Sheldon Richardson, its where we picked him that I have a problem with.

    There is no way that you could justify picking Richardson at 13 when you have a ton of actual needs. We are fine on the defensive line without Richardson, plus this marks the third straight year that we have taken a D-Lineman in the first round.

    If Richardson was available in the second round, it might not have been a bad pick, but taking him at 13 is absolutely unacceptable.
     
  19. dmw

    dmw Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2010
    Messages:
    2,879
    Likes Received:
    2,454
    The best linebackers were taken early.
     
  20. MSUJet85

    MSUJet85 ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2004
    Messages:
    12,771
    Likes Received:
    196
    He doesn't know sh*t about offense and it shows, and our linebackers are still weak and old at best, every year it is DL or CB with this guy
     

Share This Page