Disturbing Sanchez Article -- from BLOOMBERG ???

Discussion in 'New York Jets' started by JetsKickAss, Jan 1, 2013.

  1. dmw

    dmw Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2010
    Messages:
    2,877
    Likes Received:
    2,448
    He was probably thinking about all the hot, celebrity women he's bedded. Wouldn't you?
     
  2. tomdeb

    tomdeb Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2004
    Messages:
    4,384
    Likes Received:
    3,099
    I could not agree more. IT IS NOT FAIR TO THE OTHER PLAYERS busting their butts, especially the Jets defense, to keep Sanchez. If anyone think he even deserves one more snap under center, go back and watch the Titans game (or about any other from the last 2 years). Sanchez's legacy will be adding the term "butt fumble" to football vocabulary, although unlikely anyone other than him will ever repeat the maneuver in a game.
     
  3. HoffaLiesBeneath

    HoffaLiesBeneath New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2012
    Messages:
    21
    Likes Received:
    0
    Why would anyone still want to defend Sanchez?
    We were 8-5 last year and he was so bad, we lost the last 3. Santonio Holmes was so disgusted with him that he quit in the last game vs Miami.

    Sanchez was awful this year, should of been benched early. He got yet another chance in week 17 and he threw 2 picks and had a phantom fumble.

    I want him cut tomorrow. I don't care if cap hit is 80 million.

    One thing he is good at though... No matter how bad he plays and loses, he is very good at seeking out handshakes after the game and he will be at any movie premier in NYC during the week instead of focusing on the next game.
     
  4. Acad23

    Acad23 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2008
    Messages:
    26,520
    Likes Received:
    20,975
    I don't think they are capable of analyzing anything.

    Look at the play calling.
    Look at the quarterback play.
    Look at the regression.

    These three stooges are horrible at their chosen profession.

    We're stuck with Moe...Larry & Curly have to go.

    [​IMG]
     
  5. RobertTheJr

    RobertTheJr Member

    Joined:
    Dec 2, 2009
    Messages:
    830
    Likes Received:
    1
    You are basing your argument on Holmes - the guy who celebrates first downs? The guy who Pitt let go for peanuts because he was a problem?
     
  6. Barcs

    Barcs Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2011
    Messages:
    5,776
    Likes Received:
    267
    The guy who's won us many games and is our best playmaker on offense?
     
  7. dmw

    dmw Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2010
    Messages:
    2,877
    Likes Received:
    2,448
    He might be the best playmaker on the Jet offense, but he's not such a great player.
     
  8. RobertTheJr

    RobertTheJr Member

    Joined:
    Dec 2, 2009
    Messages:
    830
    Likes Received:
    1
    He has won MANY games for us? And that he is the most talented player on offense is more telling.
     
  9. ajax

    ajax Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2010
    Messages:
    3,352
    Likes Received:
    212
    This article is basically repeating what many people on the forums have posted already. Perhaps some of us should be writing for Bloomberg?
     
  10. mr nyjet

    mr nyjet Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2002
    Messages:
    9,045
    Likes Received:
    685
    even in the loss to the chargers, McElroy showed more than suckchise.

    his worst game was still miles ahead of the suckchise turnover machine.

    whether it was the pats, cards, titans, bills, or even the jags .:metal:
     
  11. Barcs

    Barcs Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2011
    Messages:
    5,776
    Likes Received:
    267
    Just imagine if he had a semi decent QB throwing his way.

    I can't recall a single game where Sanchez ever got sacked 11 times. Maybe I'm wrong, though. You are judging McElroy on one single game. You do realize that right? In fact that's the one game McElroy has ever played and he looked bad.
     
    #31 Barcs, Jan 2, 2013
    Last edited: Jan 2, 2013
  12. displacedfan

    displacedfan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2011
    Messages:
    13,737
    Likes Received:
    595
    Yeah because "dropped" can't be defined. It's relative to the throw, how the defender is trailing, how they get their hands on the ball. In relation to that, you have to include dropped catches too otherwise it's a one sided stat, then those dropped catches have YAC and what happens if they were for TDs? It's too dirty and muddy to determine dropped INTs.

    Not to be a jerk, but on the bold, you are stupid if you really want that. That hurts the team 10000000000000 times more than it's worth for cutting Sanchez. This makes no sense to me. People would rather the JETS be in a hole cap wise and Sanchez off the team, than Sanchez on the team and the Jets better off financially. This just confuses me, are more people here Sanchez haters than Jets fans? :wink:

    I wish McElroy showed more than Sanchez. He showed nothing promising except backup material. IF he showed anything promising, I wouldn't be worrying about the QB position next year.
     
  13. nyjunc

    nyjunc 2008 TGG Bryan Cox "Most Argumentative" Award Winn

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2002
    Messages:
    53,044
    Likes Received:
    1,434
    what an awful article, people are still discussing the made up stat of dropped INTs? How come they don't bring up all the dropped TDs and dropped passes? how come no mention of 2 INTs vs. GB which weren't INTs? It's garbage writing like this that sways the average fan that cannot think for themselves.
     
  14. Trip McNealy

    Trip McNealy Member

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2008
    Messages:
    792
    Likes Received:
    19
    It seems like it held true with Sanchez though, considering those dropped int's turned into actually ints these past two seasons.

    Sanchez was fools gold in 2010
     
  15. slimjasi

    slimjasi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2007
    Messages:
    7,113
    Likes Received:
    1,684
    Sanchez is an awful quarterback. Any objective observer with a modicum of intelligence and intellectual honestly realizes this. The dude has committed 89 turnovers (69 ints and 20 LOST fumbles - 43 fumbles total!) in his 4 years as a Jets starter and accounted for 80 touchdowns (68 passing, 12 rushing). He has completed 55.1% of his passes and has irrecoverably hurt his team with game-changing turnover after game-changing turnover. Despite the few delusional trouser stains who, for reasons known only to them, continue to defend this overtly overmatched player, we all KNOW that he fucking sucks.
     
    #35 slimjasi, Jan 2, 2013
    Last edited: Jan 2, 2013
  16. NewYorkEveryThing

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2012
    Messages:
    866
    Likes Received:
    15
    Glennon is slow to release the ball? That's not right. He is the top QB in my opinion.
     
  17. nyjunc

    nyjunc 2008 TGG Bryan Cox "Most Argumentative" Award Winn

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2002
    Messages:
    53,044
    Likes Received:
    1,434
    Not really, he still had 26 TDs to 18 INTs in 2011. It went up this year but agin he had no one to throw to.

    He was vital to our title game runs and played outstanding in postseason. we need to surround him w/ talent. No QB could have performed well w/ the healthy talent we had this year.
     
  18. Trip McNealy

    Trip McNealy Member

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2008
    Messages:
    792
    Likes Received:
    19
    Sanchez was brutal in 2011. Combine the turnovers and fumbles.

    Granted, Rex and Tanny were to blame with the wr corp they assembled...but Sanchez stunk too.
     
  19. HeartSpazm

    HeartSpazm New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2012
    Messages:
    84
    Likes Received:
    0
    I don't know. If we get Norv, do the Jets think he can be fixed in 1 season? I don't want to see the Jets stringing him along for a few more years where we're saying give Norv a few more years to turn Sanchez around.
     
  20. Jon_Snow

    Jon_Snow New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 22, 2012
    Messages:
    463
    Likes Received:
    0
    Norv is near the end of his expiration date @ 60 years old.
     

Share This Page