So after beating the Rams and The Colts both games had 1 thing in common. We didn't turn the ball over once no INT's and no fumbles. So is this a trend??? If you go back to 2010 we started out the season 5-1 and Sanchez didn't have a one turnover in 5 straight games and we won every single one of them. Now if you look at every game we lost this year including the close ones like the Texans and the Patriots turnovers cost us both of those games . When Sanchez doesn't turn the ball over we are a dangerous football team and can compete with anyone and probably beat anyone.Agree or Disagree?? If anyone knows Sanchez playoff stats as far as turnover let me know. I know you can say this about any team, but I think we run the table if Sanchez doesn't fumble or throw any picks
Yes, turnovers are the key. From what i've seen, aggressive defenses bringing the heat will lead to Sanchez coughing it up. He just doesn't have pre snap recognition to where the heat is coming from, and holds the ball loosely. Coaches need to recognize this, and find ways to adjust. Maybe working more on hot read plays, or check with me play calling to audible at the line. Screen passes and draw plays are another good way to keep defenses honest. We are limited with Sanchez, and need to find a way to work around those aggresive defenses, based on the talent (or lack thereof) we have on the field. Sanchez himself needs to be more aware as well, or all the coaching and game planning won't matter much.
We lost week 1 against the Ravens in 2010. Any team will play better if it doesn't turn the ball over. I think the main difference for Sanchez this week was the offense not forcing Tebow on him. No dumb plays with Tebow at TE and no pulling Sanchez after completions.
Yea and he rarely throws the ball away and it always leads to a pick or a fumble, He fumbled it yesterday but we recovered it as i remember, Austin Howard got burned by Long for the sack
and if Sanchez has the pass protection he can make all the throws that the elite quarterbacks can make. I stand by Sanchez.
I would think that the winning percentage of all NFL teams is pretty high when they commit zero turnovers in a game. Nothing of real significance here. The main takeaway is that there are way to many games with to's with Sanchez at the helm.
I think the main difference was the OL. They held strong for most of the game opening both the run and pass game. It let some of the regular plays develop. THink about the pump and throw to Schillens or the pass to Reuland. It let Sanchez wait and held the play together. IT let the WR get open. Offense goes through our OL more so than other teams
Wasn't there a team this weekend that turned the ball over 5 times and still won? As far as the Jets, limiting the TO's is extra important based on the style of offense we run. Ground and Pound with 'safe' passes sprinkled in. Not a super high scoring 'greatest show in turf' kind of an offense that can easily overcome a few TO's. Almost game plan for a few. Rex aint that guy. Rex wants stout defense that creates it's own TO's with a tough G&P Offense that wears the other team down. Remember Rex's 'color coding system' he had for Sanchez? Rex wants a safe, controlled offense where TO's are NOT expected, b/c they would be disastrous.
factoid: the Jets had seven first half possessions that ended with six different "results." Without a turnover!
My point was we aren't the Atlanta Falcons who can turn the ball over 6 times and win the game,Peyton throws picks all the time and they have won 5 straight, This team can't overcome turnovers
bellicheat will have a real problem figuring out how to beat that strategy......:rofl: the pats will run a no-huddle, put up a bundle of points early, and then make sanchez a one-dimensional qb. that dimension means turnover city.....:shit:
