The Onside Kick

Discussion in 'New York Jets' started by JetsFanDoc, Oct 9, 2012.

  1. JetsFanDoc

    JetsFanDoc Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2008
    Messages:
    978
    Likes Received:
    412
    I legitimately think that the call for the onside kick was the worst in game coaching decision I have ever seen Rex make. They had the momentum after that return, and by attempting that play they gave the momentum right back. He was not at his best last night, I don't think there's much doubt about that. I'm not giving up on him. Tannenbaum I'm done with, I don't know how he could have thought our RB situation was square. Rex is a good coach, I firmly believe that. He needs a new GM to try to rebuild the talent on this offense. While I identify that there are some mistakes Rex has made this season, I truly think that giving up on him after this season would be a mistake. I don't agree with this notion that him and Tannenbaum are "connected". How does that make any sense whatsoever? Tanny was here before Rex! Its not like he's Rex's guy, or vice versa.

    The only thing I worry about is that Woody is involved with the dealings way too closely and will not give up his puppet-master privileges that he has with Tannenbaum. If this is what is happening (and I fear it is), then we are in BIG trouble for the future.
     
  2. Diddy

    Diddy Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2012
    Messages:
    2,254
    Likes Received:
    7
    No it wasn't, the defense was gassed and they would have been out there again after giving up a long drive. It was worth the gamble I think.
     
  3. IBLEEDGREEN17

    IBLEEDGREEN17 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2007
    Messages:
    3,226
    Likes Received:
    590
    the texans offense would have most likely driven down the field quickly on a very tired jets defense. it was worth the shot to get some extra points on the board / give the defense some rest.
     
  4. Sloup

    Sloup Active Member

    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2012
    Messages:
    378
    Likes Received:
    51
    The exact opposite of this thread would have been made if Chaz Schilens would have caught the ball.
     
  5. TexansFan

    TexansFan Banned

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2011
    Messages:
    54
    Likes Received:
    0
    Rex took gambles in the game and most of them paid off. He had to because of the talent differential. His explanation was perfect, he came to win.
     
  6. Demosthenes9

    Demosthenes9 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2012
    Messages:
    2,463
    Likes Received:
    35
    Failing on the onside kick didn't give the Texans any momentum, it just gave them good field position. There is a difference.
     
  7. Jollygreenjet

    Jollygreenjet Moderator
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2002
    Messages:
    1,297
    Likes Received:
    0
    I didn't like the call, we gave up 3 easy points on that drive. I would have preferred that they kicked it deep and make the Texans drive the field for the FG. It would have been a 3 point game if we could have stopped them on that drive.
     
  8. Ozymandias

    Ozymandias Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2010
    Messages:
    3,736
    Likes Received:
    1,407
    we had it recovered, until Chaz dropped it.
     
  9. Barry the Baptist

    Barry the Baptist Hello son, would you like a lolly?
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2003
    Messages:
    17,747
    Likes Received:
    1,577
    Exactly, if Schillens holds onto the ball and we score a TD it's a brilliant call.

    My feeling, it was a good call, the execution failed
     
  10. JoeWillie130

    JoeWillie130 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 22, 2003
    Messages:
    4,362
    Likes Received:
    55
    I thought the onside kick was a great call. The defense was on the field the entire quarter and the texans just marched down the field and settled for a field goal. It was desperate but it was also gutsy and with an offense that is incompetent you have to resort to things like that to beat teams that are just clearly better than you. If Schilens comes down with the ball we are saying what a great cAll it was today and who knows we may have even been sitting at 3-2
     
  11. MoWilkShakes

    MoWilkShakes Active Member

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2010
    Messages:
    610
    Likes Received:
    30
    i hate the call even if it was a success. We had all the momentum at the point, no doubt the defense would have held.
     
  12. dawinner127

    dawinner127 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2009
    Messages:
    12,076
    Likes Received:
    12,697
    Everyone complains about the lack of talent this team has, so when the coach thinks outside of the box to make up for that lack of talent, he gets ridiculed. But if the Coach stays within the box with a lack of talent, he is ridiculed for not getting more creative.
     
  13. soxxx

    soxxx Trolls

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2009
    Messages:
    14,890
    Likes Received:
    518
    I wouldnt have minded it if we were down by 4 or 5, but we were down by 6 so putting our opponent in FG Range practically would make the game 2 possesions and harder to win.
     
  14. #1 Jets Fan

    #1 Jets Fan Guest

    It wouldn't had matter if Chez held onto the ball they called penalty on him for touching the ball to soon. But I like Rex for trying it.
     
  15. soxxx

    soxxx Trolls

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2009
    Messages:
    14,890
    Likes Received:
    518
    Yeah I keep hearing people bag on chaz, the ball was touched at the 44 which is 9 yards. Thats a penalty....
     
  16. Demosthenes9

    Demosthenes9 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2012
    Messages:
    2,463
    Likes Received:
    35
    Guess you all missed where the Ref got on the mike and said "there was no foul" as the ball had traveled the necessary distance. /shrug
     
  17. ThunderbirdJet

    ThunderbirdJet New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 14, 2005
    Messages:
    6,697
    Likes Received:
    0
    It was a stupid call, but obviously Ryan felt his tream could not win without gimmicks. That's the bottom line. After the KO return TD, momentum had swung. Losing the on sides kick was a perfect way to fuck it all up, and Ryan did.
     
  18. Demosthenes9

    Demosthenes9 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2012
    Messages:
    2,463
    Likes Received:
    35
    Or, just maybe it was a way to capitalize on the momentum and steal a possession away ?

    Hmmmmmmmm
     
  19. kubernetes

    kubernetes New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2012
    Messages:
    72
    Likes Received:
    0
    I thought it was a good call. The Texans weren't expecting it (only two defenders ran to the ball), and it only failed due to execution. Yeah, we gave up a FG, but this was a game where risks needed to be taken. Fake punt was awesome too, even though the drive didn't go anywhere.
     
  20. Vic

    Vic Member

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2005
    Messages:
    203
    Likes Received:
    0
    It was a calculated risk. Not a bad call at all.
     

Share This Page