Mark Sanchez sucks

Discussion in 'New York Jets' started by TNJet, Sep 30, 2012.

  1. JET'S_my_name

    JET'S_my_name Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2012
    Messages:
    677
    Likes Received:
    0
    Is this for real?

    Ben Volin ‏@BenVolinPBP
    And a long of 66 RT @AlBottoni After 666th MNF, Mark Sanchez has 6 TDs, 6 INTs, is averaging 6.6 YPA, has a QB rating of 66.6 and wears # 6

    *edit* Holy crap it all checks out. Crazy coincidence. http://espn.go.com/nfl/player/stats/_/id/12482/mark-sanchez
     
    #581 JET'S_my_name, Oct 9, 2012
    Last edited: Oct 9, 2012
  2. 85inthehall

    85inthehall Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2002
    Messages:
    4,409
    Likes Received:
    39
    All of these factors go into chemistry, trust and timing. I think Sanchez isn't 100% sure of the receivers route running, how the will break, how they get their head around and it causes him to hold the ball a split second longer than he would with holmes/keller/kerley in the game. This opens him up for sacks and fumbles. Also no outlet from the backfield maks simple high percentage dump off passes non-existent.

    Not only that the running game has been shit so teams don't even have to plan for it. They had what 15 running back carries last night?
     
  3. TheGreenCantona

    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2010
    Messages:
    464
    Likes Received:
    0
    but that is the thing, mark has a low completition percentage despite looking to check down on most of his plays. Mindboggling.
     
  4. JET'S_my_name

    JET'S_my_name Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2012
    Messages:
    677
    Likes Received:
    0
    Manish Mehta ‏@MMehtaNYDN
    RT @wingoz Sanchez is first QB since Stoney Case of 1999 Ravens wth 4 straight games of 25+ passes & completion percentage under 50% #nyj

    IMO that speaks volumes to the run game.
     
  5. Poeman

    Poeman Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2006
    Messages:
    14,522
    Likes Received:
    8,327
    Guys Sanchez is entering the Jamarcus Russell zone.
     
  6. JET'S_my_name

    JET'S_my_name Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2012
    Messages:
    677
    Likes Received:
    0
    FWIW

    Manish Mehta ‏@MMehtaNYDN
    17 quarterbacks have been victimized by same number or more drops as Jets QB Mark Sanchez (10) this season, per Pro Football Focus. #nyj
     
  7. 85inthehall

    85inthehall Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2002
    Messages:
    4,409
    Likes Received:
    39
    How many of those have zero running game, #1, #2, and #3 pass options out, and no outlet receiver. Give him an outlet receiver that has 10 catches and we are talking about his 55% or rate.

    You have to look at the total picture...if Holmes, Hill, Kerley, and Keller were healthy and he put up those numbers you scream ... but how much is the guy going to do? They don't even give him any simple check down/screen options.
     
  8. JET'S_my_name

    JET'S_my_name Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2012
    Messages:
    677
    Likes Received:
    0
    Yep, it's injury city.
     
  9. Pirate Captain

    Pirate Captain New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2012
    Messages:
    15
    Likes Received:
    0
    Yes they do, that's why Sanchez's YPA is at the bottom of the league, all he does is throw checkdowns.
     
  10. TNJet

    TNJet Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2011
    Messages:
    6,312
    Likes Received:
    1,636
    I think Mark moonlights for Western Union.
     
  11. JET'S_my_name

    JET'S_my_name Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2012
    Messages:
    677
    Likes Received:
    0
    Twitter wolves out today.

    Rich Cimini ‏@RichCimini
    Sanchez from last night -- only 5-for-16 on passes of 5 yds or less, according to @ESPNStatsInfo. Had as many tipped balls as comps. #Jets
     
  12. Leicester Jet

    Leicester Jet Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2007
    Messages:
    1,442
    Likes Received:
    884
    I think Eva is wearing him out! Lucky sod!!!
    :jets:
     
  13. RobertTheJr

    RobertTheJr Member

    Joined:
    Dec 2, 2009
    Messages:
    830
    Likes Received:
    1
    Just because that is all he does doesn't mean that they are easy or simple. Dropping a ball into Greene or Cumberland isn't exactly a winning game plan. Actually that those are the most often plays are telling of the offense as a whole.
     
  14. hornblower

    hornblower Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 3, 2010
    Messages:
    1,519
    Likes Received:
    1,195
    If receivers don't matter why are they drafted in the so high in every draft? It is impossible to rate Sanchez without a top running back and some quality pass catchers. One thing we know for sure is that Tebow cannot be an everyplay QB.
     
  15. NotSatoshiNakamoto

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2011
    Messages:
    16,349
    Likes Received:
    7,607
    That has a lot to do with his low completion percentage ... what do the yards per completion look like?

    He's taking way more shots downfield than last year, that's for sure.
     
  16. NYJets82

    NYJets82 New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2012
    Messages:
    279
    Likes Received:
    0
    Not his fault. The wind blows 82% harder when Sanchez is throwing, thus explaining why being terrible is not actually his fault.
     
  17. mitsudriver

    mitsudriver Member

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2010
    Messages:
    49
    Likes Received:
    14
    Sanchez is ranked 33 in completion %. Theres only 32 teams right?
     
  18. JET'S_my_name

    JET'S_my_name Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2012
    Messages:
    677
    Likes Received:
    0
    I'm guessing it's because Locker went out and Hasselbeck replaced him.
     
  19. LeonNYJ

    LeonNYJ Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2008
    Messages:
    5,006
    Likes Received:
    835
    Tennessee has 2 QBs on there. Locker 63.2%, Hasselbeck 62%

    If you take out the Buffalo game, Sanchez's comp % is 43.9%
     
  20. mitsudriver

    mitsudriver Member

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2010
    Messages:
    49
    Likes Received:
    14
    Yeah I know but you'd think an nfl starting QB would have a better % than a backup. Maybe that says something.....hmmm......
     

Share This Page