Do we still go after Braylon Edwards after drafting Stephen Hill?

Discussion in 'New York Jets' started by Jet Rider, Apr 28, 2012.

  1. Jet Rider

    Jet Rider New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2011
    Messages:
    192
    Likes Received:
    0
    The more weapons for Sanchez the better it is
     
  2. Forum7200

    Forum7200 Member

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2009
    Messages:
    298
    Likes Received:
    0
    There seems to be no need unless they can get him cheap or they feel that Hill will need time to develop.
     
  3. Jets4eva9011

    Jets4eva9011 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2011
    Messages:
    3,073
    Likes Received:
    818
    I would. More depth at offense the better
     
  4. NYCKNP

    NYCKNP Member

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2012
    Messages:
    349
    Likes Received:
    4
    If Braylon is available for cheap, possibly Jets could bring him back.
     
  5. Jake

    Jake Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2004
    Messages:
    15,749
    Likes Received:
    2,361
    Depends on whether Braylon is willing to compete with Kerley and Hill for reps.
     
  6. abyzmul

    abyzmul R.J. MacReady, 21018 Funniest Member Award Winner

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2003
    Messages:
    52,256
    Likes Received:
    24,017
    I think that getting Braylon is still an option at the right price.

    Having a 3-wide set of Hill, Edward and Schilens would turn defensive schemes on their heads, especially with Sanchez under center and Gaybow motioning as a FB or H-back. I love the adaptive thinking in that kind of formation.
     
  7. Jet Rider

    Jet Rider New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2011
    Messages:
    192
    Likes Received:
    0
    Agree if he comes cheap get him
     
  8. Tenn_JetsFanatic

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2006
    Messages:
    283
    Likes Received:
    0
    If he comes cheap, sign him
     
  9. Demosthenes9

    Demosthenes9 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2012
    Messages:
    2,463
    Likes Received:
    35
    Why stop at 3 receiver sets ?? Flood the field with receivers. I'd love it if we ran 4 receiver sets all day.
     
  10. dcm1602

    dcm1602 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2010
    Messages:
    4,895
    Likes Received:
    0
    Strongly doubt it

    We need to concentrate on hbs ol safety with our cap space
     
  11. The 1985er

    The 1985er Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2011
    Messages:
    9,070
    Likes Received:
    1,054
    Sure why not we can have 6 wide receivers on the roster.
     
  12. Run_N_gun10

    Run_N_gun10 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2005
    Messages:
    2,166
    Likes Received:
    27
    YES...:martin:
     
  13. Bill Belichdouche

    Bill Belichdouche Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2009
    Messages:
    2,773
    Likes Received:
    468
    We're still pretty thin at WR so yes braylon would be awesome if healthy and at the right price.
     
  14. Demosthenes9

    Demosthenes9 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2012
    Messages:
    2,463
    Likes Received:
    35
  15. SecondHandJets

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2011
    Messages:
    51
    Likes Received:
    2
    BE is rehabbing a knee injury... of course he'll come cheap. He'll get the vet minimum for a year, provided that he's healthy.
     
  16. abyzmul

    abyzmul R.J. MacReady, 21018 Funniest Member Award Winner

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2003
    Messages:
    52,256
    Likes Received:
    24,017
    OH FUCK YES. I have been a fan of the 18 receiver set, but I can't even get my kid's peewee coach to listen to me about it. It could even be more effective than the jump-pass.
     
  17. laxin

    laxin Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2011
    Messages:
    5,248
    Likes Received:
    23
    Im pretty sure this rules out Braylon... WR core of Tone, Hill, Kerley, Schillens and Turner is pretty solid and has a ton of upside.
     
  18. Demosthenes9

    Demosthenes9 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2012
    Messages:
    2,463
    Likes Received:
    35
    Sorry, I must have missed the memo where it was ordained that NFL offenses should only run 2 and 3 receiver sets.
     
  19. MexicanJet

    MexicanJet Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2010
    Messages:
    2,261
    Likes Received:
    333
    ONLY if on the cheap. If not, then I don't see why they would.
     
  20. abyzmul

    abyzmul R.J. MacReady, 21018 Funniest Member Award Winner

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2003
    Messages:
    52,256
    Likes Received:
    24,017
    I don't think you get me. Not even a Rex Ryan defense could cover 18 receivers.
     

Share This Page