Kawshin kawshin kawshin kawshin! Get ready for 3 thousand squayah feet of snow! Don't tawk to duh snowblowah, becawuse it's a yuge machine, okay. [YOUTUBE]61l948o9NSY[/YOUTUBE]
You missed it he started talking about this the other day. He's like "I yuhzed to be scahed of da snowblowas, like I dohnt know how ta yuhz it ya know. But now, now, now im like an exput ya know. I'll tell ya, I could do a great, great Kamurshul for da snowblowah. I dunno what kinduh wun I got but, Mink! Mink! what kinda blowah do I got? But yeah we cud have dem come by and do a Kamurshul of me blowin da snow. I'm tellin you itd be great Back afta dis
Just tuned in when espn went on a break, Did you guys hear when mikey was talking abt the world series. A caller calls and talks abt the Rangers except it was the NY Rangers... Hahahaaa... Fatso was not pleased lol. Funny stuff. Imo Kay had a better show today...
Like Fatty snowblows his own driveway. There's no fucking way he doesn't pay some landscape service to shovel and plow for him.
The Expert of all things talks to Phil Simms dismorning. He basically tells Phil with his question that Rivis and da Chargis played terrible against the Jets last week. Simms says that he saw that it was the Jets D and Revis that does things that stop Offenses. There wasn't anything open for Rivers. The great thing about my job Mike, is that I have a great view of the games. Revis is even better than I thought he was. Fatty changes the subject and starts talking about the Raiders game.
if the jets beat a bad team by a lot, it's because the bad team is really bad and they gave up and stopped trying early in the game. when they beat the really good team it's because the good team played terribly and the jets got a couple of lucky bounces. his excuse for dez bryant not having a 100 yard game and being a bit disappointing... He is unda utilized! he's da most talented wide recivah in da league and he's not used propily!
Not sure if you were being sarcastic or not, but this isn't close to being true. According to the Census Bureau, the average square footage of new homes in the US has gone from 1660 in 1973 to 2400-2500 now (median square footage is about 200 square feet less). In the 1940s and 1950s houses were even smaller (much smaller - around 1100 square feet on average). Of course, houses get expanded, but at nowhere near the amount necessary to double the housing size from the value for new homes. Also, almost 90% of new houses in the US have been built on lots of a half-acre or less for at least the last 40 years. http://www.census.gov/const/C25Ann/sftotalmedavgsqft.pdf http://www.census.gov/const/C25Ann/lotsizesold.pdf
Wow, I didn't listen, so I had no idea that that was from him! Clearly he needs a Tony Reali to correct his errors at the end of each show, although unfortunately that would probably take about 15 minutes to do every day. GM, sorry for implying that it was you that was saying something incorrect.
i think he said the avg home is 3,500 sq feet. everyone that called up and disagreed he told them they wuh lawst and hung up. then he went around to the producers and asked how big their home was. most said like 2,500 or 2,700. of course tank rounds it and says Ok I wasn't dat faw awwf. i said 3,000!
Giants -10.... I nevah picked dat! Going to be funny if Miami wins. He's going to have no choice but to kill the Giants tomorrow.
