Ochocinco and Owens BOTH want to play for the Jets...

Discussion in 'New York Jets' started by jetsclaps, Jan 24, 2011.

  1. N.O jets fan

    N.O jets fan New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2011
    Messages:
    14
    Likes Received:
    0
    I hope they really don't let braylon of holmes go, I just bought their jerseys!!! Besides with T.Os attitude and being the ball hog as he is, I don't think sanchez should have that stress on his shoulders. But hey, that's just my opinion. Chad probably wouldn't be bad if something did happen to holmes or edwards but I would use him as a last resort.
     
    #101 N.O jets fan, Jan 31, 2011
    Last edited: Jan 31, 2011
  2. soxxx

    soxxx Trolls

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2009
    Messages:
    14,890
    Likes Received:
    518
    If we were to lose Edwards AND Holmes, then I would consider this an option. But till that happens then no.
     
  3. FJF

    FJF 2018 MVP Joe Namath Award Winner

    Joined:
    Feb 29, 2008
    Messages:
    27,721
    Likes Received:
    31,387
    i'd rather go 3 t.e. short yardage formations every play than have these 2 on the roster
     
  4. Steve032

    Steve032 New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2007
    Messages:
    5,148
    Likes Received:
    0
    First off, they don't come in a package deal. Signing/Trading for one does not mean the Jets will get the other. If we can't sign either Holmes or Edwards, I wouldn't mind getting Chad85.

    But fuck no to Owens
     
  5. jetsons

    jetsons Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2010
    Messages:
    1,140
    Likes Received:
    34
    not one cancer but two...no effin way
     
  6. jetsons

    jetsons Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2010
    Messages:
    1,140
    Likes Received:
    34
    3 yards & a cloud of dust is better than having these 2 clowns around.
     
  7. Dirty6Sanchez

    Dirty6Sanchez Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2010
    Messages:
    2,898
    Likes Received:
    64
    Ocho would be fine with me, FUCK TO tho.
     
  8. BiG CHoPz

    BiG CHoPz Member

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2010
    Messages:
    301
    Likes Received:
    4
    At this point in their careers, chad would probably produce more, but I wouldn't want either.
     
  9. Footballgod214

    Footballgod214 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2005
    Messages:
    15,220
    Likes Received:
    6,086
    id love to have 85
     
  10. fozzi58

    fozzi58 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2006
    Messages:
    4,030
    Likes Received:
    70
    Can you imagine 85 in the NY market? can you imaging the amount of antics that he would pull in the end zone and his clowing with Revis? Would be pure comedy.
     
  11. championjets69

    championjets69 2008/2009 TGG Darksider Award Winner

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2002
    Messages:
    17,353
    Likes Received:
    866
    Tell them to immediately ring up Tomlin since he coaches a team that has a winning tradition & he already has won 2 SBs. Make sure to remind them we have won NOTHING in 42 tears & Rex has won nothing as a HC up to now :jets:
     
  12. kevmvp

    kevmvp Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2006
    Messages:
    3,864
    Likes Received:
    643
    Chad would not be a terrible addition at the right price. But thats only if we lose one of Holmes or Edwards.
     
  13. Mambo9

    Mambo9 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2009
    Messages:
    8,906
    Likes Received:
    41
    Ocho Cinco would career years under rex! Plus he could also kick off :p

    If it's for a bag of crisps... get it done Tanny!
     
  14. JfaulkNYJ

    JfaulkNYJ New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2009
    Messages:
    6,967
    Likes Received:
    0
    i thought the board went over this in a 3page thread? fuck no. i would consider Ocho, if we lose one of the free agent WR's.

    But still rather not have Ocho.
     
  15. dawinner127

    dawinner127 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2009
    Messages:
    12,076
    Likes Received:
    12,697
    If we do lose one of Holmes or Edwards, I wouldn't mind signing Chad to a 1 or 2 year contract, relatively cheap. The guy already has enough money for life and all he wants now is a monster rock to go on his finger. I think he could be signed cheap, but only if we lose Holmes or Edwards -- which I hope we don't.
     
  16. abyzmul

    abyzmul R.J. MacReady, 21018 Funniest Member Award Winner

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2003
    Messages:
    52,380
    Likes Received:
    24,163
    I hate both of these guys.
     
  17. Sundayjack

    Sundayjack pǝʇɔıppɐ ʎןןɐʇoʇ
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2003
    Messages:
    10,643
    Likes Received:
    1,044
    PT Barnum made a fortune signing all sorts goofballs, fatties, trannies, shorties, hairies, and other such misfits for his offense. But that's only because people wanted to see a freak show. As much as Rex might like to smell feet in his personal time, the Jets aren't a freak show, and certainly don't need new freaks. I'd suggest Oakland.
     
  18. ProfJets

    ProfJets Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2011
    Messages:
    1,023
    Likes Received:
    762
    Not interested in either T.O. or Chad Johnson (Revis shut him down, therefore he is Chad Johnson) on their own. I wouldn't mind the Jets getting Chad if they lost Braylon or Holmes (which seems likely), though I think they'd be better off finding someone younger.
    Chad is much prefered to T.O. Chad Johnson is just a guy who likes to talk smack and show off and do end-zone and side-line shenanigans. No offense to the Commissioner, but Chad Johnson is harmless.
    T.O. on the other hand is to NFL locker rooms as the bubonic plague is to health.
     
  19. joeklecko

    joeklecko New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2002
    Messages:
    1,465
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ugh!!!

    No thanks to either or both.
     
  20. Jets Dan

    Jets Dan New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2010
    Messages:
    234
    Likes Received:
    0
    Amen. We don't need either of their big mouths.
     

Share This Page