Marquice Cole in for Drew Coleman?

Discussion in 'New York Jets' started by MikeDevito, Jan 3, 2011.

  1. DevTeam

    DevTeam Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2005
    Messages:
    1,412
    Likes Received:
    61
    Colts O Line is also a steaming pile of loose stool this year -- remember that. Peyton doesn't have enough time to find receivers against teams that can generate a pass rush. Do we have that ability? Depends on which team shows up.
     
  2. Big Blocker

    Big Blocker Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 7, 2008
    Messages:
    13,104
    Likes Received:
    1,348
    I liked Cole very much yesterday, and agree with the sentiment that Coleman, whatever his talents, is not a good cover guy.

    But the other person I think we might see the Jets use is Wilson. Imo he has quietly been playing better. Perhaps the tandem of Cole and Wilson can be better employed to cover Colt receivers than the safeties who for the most part are rather poor in coverage.
     
  3. MadBacker Prime

    MadBacker Prime THE Dead Rabbit

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2009
    Messages:
    10,752
    Likes Received:
    0
    Wilson looked improved too, certainly has the speed to keep up with any receiver the Colts have.
     
  4. rohirrim665

    rohirrim665 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2008
    Messages:
    2,742
    Likes Received:
    686
    Agree with this. Its a scary time to try out Marquice Cole though. At least Coleman has his feet wet.
     
  5. Italian Seafood

    Italian Seafood New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2005
    Messages:
    12,545
    Likes Received:
    3
    I think Cole's play probably gives Rex & Co another piece to use and move around, which is what they like to do.

    Also, maybe should be its own thread, but does anyone else get the sense that we'll see a lot more of Jason Taylor now to try and get more pressure on the QB without blitzing? I felt like his extended time yesterday was to get him ramped up for more time in the playoffs after taking it light the majority of the season. If he and Pace play anything like yesterday they can take some of the burden off the cover guys.
     
  6. MikeHoncho

    MikeHoncho Trolls

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2010
    Messages:
    3,018
    Likes Received:
    0
    I thought Wilson and Cole both looked better in coverage than Coleman.. Coleman is horrendous. If he's covering one of the Colts receivers down the field, Peyton will target it every time.
     
  7. WhiteShoeWillis

    WhiteShoeWillis Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2006
    Messages:
    19,492
    Likes Received:
    41
    That's my thought. I'd rather put someone with less experience out there and take my chances. We KNOW Coleman is awful in coverage.
     
  8. MikeHoncho

    MikeHoncho Trolls

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2010
    Messages:
    3,018
    Likes Received:
    0
    I hope you are right.. I think we will be seeing a lot of Taylor this game to rush the passer because they really don't have to worry about stopping the run at all. Last year they lined up mostly with Douglas or Ellis at DT and even used Pace inside from time to time.. very little DeVito and Pouha.

    We could be seeing a lot of "small" formations with Ellis, Pryce, Thomas on the line with Pace and Taylor as outside rushers to get as much pressure as they can and dare the Colts to run.
     
  9. Jetfanmack

    Jetfanmack haz chilens?

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2002
    Messages:
    21,496
    Likes Received:
    314
    I just think it gives us more options. If Coleman plays early and gets picked on, try Cole. If that doesn't work, try Wilson. Revis and Cromartie should match up fine with Wayne and Garcon. Blair White really isn't that good. But if the pass rush doesn't get there, that's when the 3rd CB would get exposed.
     
  10. MBGreen

    MBGreen Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2008
    Messages:
    18,107
    Likes Received:
    1
    /thread


    *truth filler*
     
  11. Italian Seafood

    Italian Seafood New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2005
    Messages:
    12,545
    Likes Received:
    3
    Yes. I just don't want to see DeVito or Taylor in coverage chasing a fast RB down the field, that never ends well for us.
     
  12. kevmvp

    kevmvp Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2006
    Messages:
    3,864
    Likes Received:
    643
    Marquice Cole had 2 picks on broken plays where the QB got hit and the ball floated up in the air. He like Coleman is a good special teams player who's best use on defense is to blitz the QB.

    I mean I guess he didnt look bad but you cant take much out of that game.
     
  13. theyankees-jetsfan23

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2010
    Messages:
    209
    Likes Received:
    0
    How come we got rid of Donald Strickland? He was good against slot recievers
     
  14. MBGreen

    MBGreen Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2008
    Messages:
    18,107
    Likes Received:
    1
    he frequently got injured.
     
  15. ukilledkenny

    ukilledkenny You bastards!

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2005
    Messages:
    8,343
    Likes Received:
    0
    Cole and Wilson seemed fine on the outside. It seems that all of our guys really suck as nickel backs. I wouldn't mind seeing Cole get a little more of a chance in coverage. Game was meaningless to us but he has to be feeling pretty confident after that game. A little confidence can go a long way for someone who has the physical ability to do something.
     
  16. MBGreen

    MBGreen Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2008
    Messages:
    18,107
    Likes Received:
    1
    Wilson showed some pretty good coverage skills against Steve Johnson.....broke up some nice plays that could've went for TDs
     
  17. ukilledkenny

    ukilledkenny You bastards!

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2005
    Messages:
    8,343
    Likes Received:
    0
    I think Wilson could also get some more time in coverage. Coleman sucks in coverage but blitzes like a beast. One of those two guys has to see the field for coverage responsibilities on the slot over Coleman in the playoffs.
     
  18. Rockefella

    Rockefella Trolls

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2009
    Messages:
    3,669
    Likes Received:
    0
    This secondary is lacking players with dreads. Cole is the secret weapon
     
  19. WhiteShoeWillis

    WhiteShoeWillis Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2006
    Messages:
    19,492
    Likes Received:
    41
    He did make some good plays, I just have a hard time putting much stock into any of the play from our secondary against Brian Brohm.
     
  20. MBGreen

    MBGreen Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2008
    Messages:
    18,107
    Likes Received:
    1
    i hear you...

    But...it's still a positive. The young guys are improving.


    It beats the backups getting burned by Brohm..... :wink:
     

Share This Page