We will be tied a top afc east after sunday

Discussion in 'New York Jets' started by #1 Jets Fan, Dec 11, 2010.

  1. bojanglesman

    bojanglesman Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2009
    Messages:
    6,123
    Likes Received:
    0
    I'm pretty sure the Bears will have a much better chance of beating the Pats than the Jets at this point. They probably won't win, but they have a better chance. I'll be watching Peppers in that game. Maybe Cutler won't shit the bed.
     
  2. capetide

    capetide Banned

    Joined:
    May 17, 2004
    Messages:
    117
    Likes Received:
    0
    You mean the same D that the Jets O only managed to score 3 points against?
     
  3. Quinnenthebeast

    Quinnenthebeast Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2008
    Messages:
    3,653
    Likes Received:
    2,880
    Perhaps he's referring to Walkers SHORTbread. Hahaha thats what I'm calling Wes Welker now.
     
  4. Brady_champ

    Brady_champ Banned

    Joined:
    Dec 2, 2010
    Messages:
    39
    Likes Received:
    0
    YEAH OK JET FANS

    You still have 2 serious contendors (both away) on your schedule..you have yet to prove that you can beat even one.

    Well I guess week 2 if you wanna count that, but that has all types of question marks on it after last week. That's no ordinary split fellas.

    Pats have risen up to challenge after challenge this year. @ Bears and home to green bay are hardly the two toughest games we've looked at this year. I'd go 50/50 on the Bears game, but if we end up going back to foxboro..after a loss...GB will get lit up. If we win the bears game, we can afford to drop the GB one.

    I'd bet money that by Week 17, the pats will have legit separation and not even need to play, even though it's a divisional game
     
  5. stanner

    stanner Member

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2009
    Messages:
    340
    Likes Received:
    1
    Don't the bears have a message board? Go douche it up over there.
     
  6. JetBlue

    JetBlue Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2004
    Messages:
    11,649
    Likes Received:
    5,870
    no, we are just fans, so we can concentrate on both games. not to fucking mention that the Jets can go undefeated the rest of the season and still finish in second place, so unless all you are concerned about is finishing in second place we need to bank on the Pats losing.

    what a horrible fucking post. truly embarrassing, from the lame cliches to lack of awareness of what the nonsense meant. either you don't realize we need the Pats to lose to have a chance to finish in first, or you are content with the Jets finishing second. so which is it?
     
  7. CraigF1210

    CraigF1210 Member

    Joined:
    Nov 18, 2009
    Messages:
    299
    Likes Received:
    1

    Anyone saying that tis division is done in either direction is (insert demeaning term here)

    Its a one game lead with 4 to go and tiebreakers depending on those 4. You can't say the Pats are a 100% lock against any team, if that was the case they would not have lost to the Browns.

    This division is going to come down to who finishes stronger, especially against the divisional opponents.
     
  8. Brady_champ

    Brady_champ Banned

    Joined:
    Dec 2, 2010
    Messages:
    39
    Likes Received:
    0
    For real?

    I don't know how you define lock, but I mean..

    NFL Record consecutive regular-season home win streak (vs dolphins)
    NFL Record consec wins against an opponent (Bills). Both more or less only there to play spoilers, seasons dead already.

    That's a little "assuming" I guess..but come on, really?

    If we win both, you're a LONG SHOT.

    You'd NEED the pats to lose the other 2, and you'd need to undefeated, including @ Steelers @ Bears.

    Weirder things have happened in the NFL, and "never say never", but that's not a toss-up situation by any means
     
  9. ace_o_spades

    ace_o_spades New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2008
    Messages:
    14,391
    Likes Received:
    1
    In all fairness this is a Patriots-driven thread so naturally bandwag...err...patriot fans will undoubtedly show up.

    :rofl: well done
     
  10. jerseyjet0912

    jerseyjet0912 Banned

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2009
    Messages:
    1,222
    Likes Received:
    0
    the pats rarely lose games they arent supposed to...its not even worth getting your hopes up they'll beat chicago by 3 tds
     
  11. PatsFan2003

    PatsFan2003 Member

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2010
    Messages:
    734
    Likes Received:
    6
    Having a blizzard in Chicago certainly helps the Bears D more then the Patriots offense but I think Brady has a lot of good experience in cold, bad weather. Does Cutler?
     
  12. AbdulSalam

    AbdulSalam New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2008
    Messages:
    4,575
    Likes Received:
    0
    If Brady continues to play the way he played on MNF they could have 4 feet of snow falling and Brady would still pick apart the Bears D. However, unlike the Jets, the Bears will probably have realized that the way to beat the Pats is to run the ball and that should give them a decent chance of competing.
     
  13. GreenMachine

    Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2003
    Messages:
    12,528
    Likes Received:
    6

    So wait, if week 2 we lost to NE 43-3, and last week we beat NE 28-14, what would your knowledge bring us?
     
  14. truthbtold

    truthbtold Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2008
    Messages:
    2,865
    Likes Received:
    1,575
    The Pats looked like Supermen against us, but nobody in this league is going 14-2 this year.

    I love the Bears' chances on a snowy field. It will definitely slow down the Pats offense and the Bears have a big edge in defense and running game.

    And ... I love GB's chances against them the following week, because they also have a solid D that puts pressure on the QB ... and they have one of the best downfiled passing games in the league. They'll test that Pat secondary the way we didn't/couldn't.
     
  15. perfectpackage99

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2005
    Messages:
    358
    Likes Received:
    0
    I agree with you 100%, I expect the Jets to demolish the Phins today, Pats will get beat by Chicago in a huge upset as well. Pats think they are on top of the world right now, but I can't wait to see the BEARS spank them today
     
  16. The Sanchise

    The Sanchise Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2010
    Messages:
    1,064
    Likes Received:
    1
    whatever dude. Nothing says the Bears are going to win today.

    Nothing says we'll win today. ALthough I bet we do. I think New England will also. THere are no guarantees in this league.
     
  17. Jetfanmack

    Jetfanmack haz chilens?

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2002
    Messages:
    21,496
    Likes Received:
    314
    Bears have a good shot at winning. The problem is, we would still need them to lose again and us to win out to win the division.
     
  18. MayoGate

    MayoGate Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2007
    Messages:
    2,688
    Likes Received:
    1
    In my opinion this is the game of games for the Pats and the number 1 seed .. I don't think they match up well with the Packers .. Lose to the Bears and it's a must win for the Pats next week at home. Not saying that Buff and Miami are gimmes .. but this one is very important for them . .
     
  19. skeleton_frames

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2010
    Messages:
    789
    Likes Received:
    0
    Exactly. The tiebreakers still dictate that they need to lose next week as well vs GB (which is possible) OR lose one of their remaining two games.

    At the end of the day, all the Jets can control is going 13-3. If they can do that, they'll get a good shot of confidence from A- going 5-1 in the division and beating good Chicago and Pittsburgh clubs on the road.

    If it isn't done already, maybe a mod should sticky the tie breaker rules in a thread so we don't have to keep bringing them up in multiple locations?

     
  20. Elijah

    Elijah New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2010
    Messages:
    164
    Likes Received:
    0
    I'm not supposed to point out sarcasm when people clearly don't get it?
     

Share This Page