LOL, funny. The Jets match up super well with the Fins, who may have been the most overrated team in the pre-season. Although I do like Ricky.
Slants? Aside from the one Homes begged for, and the subsequent TD pass to Edwards...Where are you seeing them? Had we called one at 24-3 (or a fade) instead of a post pattern..we might not be bitching about 45-3. I'm not going to berate you for making shit up. I'll ask the rest of the posters... Has the slant really been a big part of our passing game?
But they won't. Like Denver, Cleveland, Cincy and Detroit, we'll have to pull a victory out of our asses, even though we field the most talented roster on offense top to bottom in the NFL. But you'd rather not address that. And I had to search out the pic. So you can be wrong twice.
This whole change the other person's posts thing is really fun. I see why you do it so much. I had to go through and change your post to actually match what I was saying because as usual you twist it around from an attempt to stay towards the center to some crazy extreme that you feel the need to deal in. Jets ran a shit load of slants in whatever game the Edwards slant TD came in. Since the Brown game they have ran plenty of slants. Before the Browns game they ran less slants but we also had the pleasure of watching Holmes and Cotchery drop a lot of them for a few weeks.
2nd and 8, with Edwards one on one on the outside they line him up tight, and then call him to run intothe inside of a 9 man front. Push him out wide, the slant was wide open.
Sadly, the bottom is our second year QB who still struggles finding his short and intermediate routes when his number one read isn't there. You won't want to address that though. So you can be wrong more times than I can count.
No. They didn't. You're talking about the Houston game. http://www.nfl.com/gamecenter/20101...:analyze/analyze-channels:cat-post-playbyplay Yeah..show me the slants. And then we ran ONE to Holmes the week after...
Only in continuing to address you. Yes, the bottom is a 2nd year QB. But that should emphasize the need for a short passing game that your ballwashed Schitty does not believe in... We can agree to disagree on that point. But...saying he runs the plays, when everyone else watching the games notes the opposite, is to deny any attempt at discussing the obvious reality. Don't get me wrong here. I LOVE WR/QB play, and Big throws down the sideline, it's my favorite part of the game. But....there are necessary ingredients to success, and this guy is eschewing one, and has done so in spite of having not ONE, but TWO (and McKnight may be three) players on the roster that give you the ability to be unstoppable.
You are amazing. Show you the slants in the typed out play by play? Sure I'll get right on that one! I watch the games and take account of what I have seen instead of spending the whole time thinking about what I should have seen instead. Try it sometime, you might actually get an idea of what is going on.
Shouldn't that be the case in which Sanchez and Edwards make some sort of sight adjusment and change the route at the line?
I would think so. But I don't know what the rules for that are. But I'm sitting here as we speak, watching the last 4 weeks on tape. I think this call, was designed for the QB to read the LB. On the play fake the LB comes in (Sanchez speaks to this, when he says I threw the ball a little flat)... But.... Edwards is lined up tight. Then runs into quintuple coverage.(Post pattern, 9 in the box). The CB has his eyes in the backfield, watching the play action, then thinking about doubling Keller. All 17 needs to do is run up, out and up, to isolate the DB behind him.
I'm not the one creating realities. I'm watching the tape. These shitload of slants you speak of do not exist.
I don't deny reality. You tell me there aren't any slants. I say there are slants and you tell me I am ball washing Schotty. If you want to argue that there should be more slants that is fine but you always, always take it to an extreme. Such as saying there are no slants or that we didn't run any at all. I don't need to go back and watch anything to know that the Edwards Slant TD wasn't even the first slant of that particular drive. Know how I know that? I was watching the game and taking account of what was actually happening, not worrying about what I thought should have been happening. Just to show you one example of you having no idea what you are talking about lets go back to the Sanchez INT to Edwards Monday night that you will probably go to your grave blaming Schotty for. http://www.metacafe.com/watch/nf-9dde663aaba64d95abdc6c22b4d36995/sanchez_throws_red_zone_int/ Wait until they show the replay from the high angle. Holmes looks pretty open to me but Sanchez didn't see that because he was too busy forcing a throw into quadruple coverage. This is why I refuse to put the blame for shit like this on Schotty. The play call was fine, the execution was awful.
Ya know, I don't understand why we don't run the slant and go pattern. It's obviously wide open every play yet schitty wants to keep his same pattern of run, run, pass or pass, run, pass or pass, pass run or whatever the fuck that obviously predictable pattern his cutesy ass goes with is. Run the post-corner-post, ITS THERE, WIDE OPEN.
