Cimini Calls Win Over Bengals "Another Miracle Win". Huh?

Discussion in 'New York Jets' started by TommyGreen, Nov 26, 2010.

  1. Talisman

    Talisman Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2009
    Messages:
    4,512
    Likes Received:
    0
    it must kill you to see the Jets at 9-2
     
  2. fozzi58

    fozzi58 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2006
    Messages:
    4,030
    Likes Received:
    71
    The real miracle is that Matt Millen and Joe Thiesman have jobs.
     
  3. statjeff22

    statjeff22 2008 Green Guy "Most Knowledgeable" Award Winner

    Joined:
    Jun 4, 2005
    Messages:
    27,101
    Likes Received:
    7,046
    The Jets outgained the Bengals 336-181. They completely dominated both sides of special teams. The Bengals had one drive the entire game that was longer than 28 yards, while the Jets had four that went for longer than 40. The only aspect of the game that the Jets did not play at a high level was Sanchez in the second half (5/11 for 35 yards and an INT), and even then he threw a TD pass.

    The Jets clearly dominated the game, and it's not even a close call.
     
  4. Barry the Baptist

    Barry the Baptist Hello son, would you like a lolly?
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2003
    Messages:
    17,751
    Likes Received:
    1,589
    Just like the roughing call on Palmer or the roughing call on Owens aren't usually called by competent officials to keep drives alive. I could play this game too.

    If you take away the call on Coleman for roughing they score 3 and not 7. You take away the questionable call for block in the back by Harris on the Cromartie INT and the Bengals don't even get the good field position to be in the position to score. If you take away the roughing call on 4th and 3 that kept a Bengals drive alive the Jets get the ball near mid field and who knows what they do?

    The Jets D held the Bengals to 49 yards in the second half. What part of that would not consitute dominating? Owens had 1 catch in the 2nd half and OchoCinco had none. Just wanted to clarify that for you.
     
  5. Scoffaveli3

    Scoffaveli3 Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 18, 2009
    Messages:
    844
    Likes Received:
    0
    Sure the Jets dominated special teams. But like I said, that isn't something you can count on happening every game. The 90 yard kick return skews that number. Do you really see Brad Smith returning a kick for a TD every game?

    As far as drive distance, does that really matter? Only in a game of field position. But there are no points awarded for drives of 40 yards or longer

    The ball bouncing off Cincys head was a clear fluke and set up the easy TD.

    No unbiased person would call that game domination
     
  6. Scoffaveli3

    Scoffaveli3 Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 18, 2009
    Messages:
    844
    Likes Received:
    0
    Questionable calls happen in every game. Regardless of the bad calls and fluke plays, it still did not constitute domination.

    Really it is an insult to your team to call that "dominant". The D didn't play very well on 3rd down and the offense couldn't sustain any drives
     
  7. Barry the Baptist

    Barry the Baptist Hello son, would you like a lolly?
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2003
    Messages:
    17,751
    Likes Received:
    1,589
    Do teams normally have 49 yards in the 2nd half of games and win? So what your saying is the Jets should be penalized because Smith ran a kick back. Were the Eagles penalized because Vick threw 6 TDs in a game and that doesn't happen every game? Of course not, your just being a pain. No unbiased person would say the Jets didn't dominate.
     
  8. ace_o_spades

    ace_o_spades New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2008
    Messages:
    14,391
    Likes Received:
    1
    Cincy was 4-15 on 3rd down, the defense was dominant last night. Palmer was 17-38 with 2 picks and a safety. The offense wasn't good last night but the defense really stepped up.
     
  9. Barry the Baptist

    Barry the Baptist Hello son, would you like a lolly?
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2003
    Messages:
    17,751
    Likes Received:
    1,589
    Really? The Bengals were 4 for 15 on 3rd down which would constitute a less then 30% success rate? Palmer threw more incomplete passes then he threw completions. Cedric Benson was held to 41 yards and Owens and OchoCinco had 7 receptiosn for 58 yards between the two of them. The only player on Cinci that you could even make te case for having a good game was Shipley but he only had 38 yards.
     
    #29 Barry the Baptist, Nov 26, 2010
    Last edited: Nov 26, 2010
  10. statjeff22

    statjeff22 2008 Green Guy "Most Knowledgeable" Award Winner

    Joined:
    Jun 4, 2005
    Messages:
    27,101
    Likes Received:
    7,046
    The rushing offense was excellent also, with over 170 yards. The only aspect of the game in which the Jets didn't dominate was the passing offense, and it was perfectly fine in the first half. But you see if a team isn't dominant in one aspect of the game (but were still clearly better than the opponent), that means they didn't dominate the game. :rolleyes:
     
  11. Barry the Baptist

    Barry the Baptist Hello son, would you like a lolly?
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2003
    Messages:
    17,751
    Likes Received:
    1,589
    Apparently in bizarro world and even as bad as Sanchez was he was still better then Palmer.
     
  12. skeleton_frames

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2010
    Messages:
    789
    Likes Received:
    0
    What a total douche nozzle. The Bengals O was nowhere to be seen yesterday and the Jets finally had some pressure on the QB. The Bengals were lucky to get drives extended on ridiculous penalties.
     
  13. Steve032

    Steve032 New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2007
    Messages:
    5,148
    Likes Received:
    0
    Yes, Cimini, let's take away two touchdowns and give the Bengals the ball back on another possession. WTF IS THE SHIT?
     
  14. The Uniform Bomber

    The Uniform Bomber Spivey's Agent

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2005
    Messages:
    8,389
    Likes Received:
    177
    Dude, for your own good, just stop. You have no idea what you're talking about.
     
  15. Barry the Baptist

    Barry the Baptist Hello son, would you like a lolly?
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2003
    Messages:
    17,751
    Likes Received:
    1,589
    There was a reason Lewis didn't challenge it. Did it hit Caldwell? I don't know but Lewis had to think at the very least it did or he would have challenged it.
     
  16. mute

    mute Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2010
    Messages:
    9,113
    Likes Received:
    3,142
    :rofl::rofl: cant stop laughing at this.
     
    #36 mute, Nov 26, 2010
    Last edited: Nov 26, 2010
  17. pats-hater

    pats-hater Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2005
    Messages:
    6,096
    Likes Received:
    0
    Manish is a miracle, Cimini is an abomination...
     
  18. pats-hater

    pats-hater Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2005
    Messages:
    6,096
    Likes Received:
    0
    :metal::metal:Can't stop staring at your avatar.
     
  19. skeleton_frames

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2010
    Messages:
    789
    Likes Received:
    0
    Exactly. And based on the lack of camera angles on NFL Network it would have been impossible to reverse the call on the field anyways. Maybe that Saturday night replay with all of the cameras will make it easier to see definitively?

    And Cimini's hypothetical 'what ifs' are annoying. What if Edwards doesn't commit a stupid penalty on a FG attempt and Greene doesn't fumble against Baltimore? What if Holmes doesn't drop what would have been a TD against GB? Then this team would be 11-0.

    What if, what if, what if...
     
  20. rex-N-effects

    rex-N-effects New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2010
    Messages:
    498
    Likes Received:
    0
    we could blow out the pats 50-0 and it'll still be a miracle, lucky win
     

Share This Page