BGA: Packers @Jets

Discussion in 'New York Jets' started by WhiteShoeWillis, Nov 4, 2010.

  1. WhiteShoeWillis

    WhiteShoeWillis Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2006
    Messages:
    19,492
    Likes Received:
    41
    http://www.thejetsblog.com/2010/11/04/bga-packers-at-jets/
     
  2. WhiteShoeWillis

    WhiteShoeWillis Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2006
    Messages:
    19,492
    Likes Received:
    41
    continued ...
     
  3. Fiftynine

    Fiftynine Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2010
    Messages:
    3,621
    Likes Received:
    1,463
    What is this garbage?

    Well reasoned? Logical? An author who clearly reviewed the game multiple times?

    Not the thing we need around here.

    Fire Schotty! Sign Randy!

    :smile:
     
  4. ajax

    ajax Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2010
    Messages:
    3,352
    Likes Received:
    212
    Great analysis. After reading, I'm even more impressed than before with this D.
    Offense .... well ... guess you can't have it all.

    GB defensive gameplan was great & was helped out w/ the strong/unpredictable winds. Hopefully, this will calm down the masses who insist on running into 8+ men in the box. Greene needs to work on his blocking or receiving. Just too predictable what his role is when he's out there. LT failing to break tackles also.

    Just seemed to be an off day across the board offensively & in special teams.
     
  5. LeonNYJ

    LeonNYJ Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2008
    Messages:
    5,016
    Likes Received:
    838
    Great point about Greene. It's almost a guarantee that when he comes into the game that the Jets will be running the ball. They don't have enough confidence to use him often in the passing game.
     
  6. fozzi58

    fozzi58 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2006
    Messages:
    4,030
    Likes Received:
    71


    A giant block of shit no one wants to read.

    Actually it was a really good analysis. Very impressed with the detailed observations.
     
  7. fozzi58

    fozzi58 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2006
    Messages:
    4,030
    Likes Received:
    71
    Absolutely agree. However, he better spend his off days in front of the jugs machine cause we are going to need his hands.
     
  8. Fiftynine

    Fiftynine Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2010
    Messages:
    3,621
    Likes Received:
    1,463
    Agreed, when a D sees Greene in the game, they stack the box. They should run more play action when he's on the field.
     
  9. bucknasty

    bucknasty Member

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2009
    Messages:
    738
    Likes Received:
    4
    you think they could use this as a decoy though, keep the defenseguessing , maybe throw in some play action once in a while
     
  10. WhiteShoeWillis

    WhiteShoeWillis Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2006
    Messages:
    19,492
    Likes Received:
    41
    That's why that screen play to green was a great call, unfortunately he didn't catch the damn thing.
     
  11. Namath2Kolber

    Namath2Kolber New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2006
    Messages:
    3,970
    Likes Received:
    1
    This article supports what a lot of us realized after watching the Packers game - our receivers need to step up and play a lot better.
     
  12. gustoonarmy

    gustoonarmy 2006-2007 TGG.com Best International Poster of the

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2004
    Messages:
    14,174
    Likes Received:
    160
    Post this review in the locker room, please.
     
  13. Clown

    Clown New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2009
    Messages:
    215
    Likes Received:
    0
    Great analysis! i wonder why they dont use too much play action with greene too. Imean its not like greene is the only running back has issues catching in this league.
     
  14. Zach

    Zach Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2002
    Messages:
    9,508
    Likes Received:
    2,318
    All right. I feel a lot better after reading this passage. Maybe my obnoxious shots against Schotty wasn't all that warranted this week.

    But then, if the most culpable of them all were the WR crews, then the blame should go to... what, Henry Ellard? (I didn't like that guy anyway...)
     

Share This Page