I understand the thinking on the 2nd NE game(we win the 1st NE game w/ him so that's a wash) but why the first Buf game? The only reason Buf had a chance was b/c of an awful INT by Favre. Another useful post from JJ!:rofl2:
That's a poor excuse, receivers drop balls from time to time- it happens. Favre was off the mark on most of his throws yesterday especially in the 2nd half.
They should change this name of this site to the "gangofpennington.com" I am so sick of Pennington this, Pennington that. Can't you people just rejoice with the fact that we're 9-5 right now, and leading the division. You'd think that coming off of a 4-12 season that we'd all be flying high right now. But no... always have to find something to complain about.
How many TDs does favre have the last 3 games again? Oh ya - 1. If 4 TD's in 3 games sucks then....? Why dont you say it. Miami's offense only ran 13 plays the whole second half yesterday. Their D couldn't get off the field against Hill. You are a vain person with your name calling as well.
Aside from the NE game where the MIA defense got torched, Miami has only allowed 1 Offensive TD in 5 games!. One TD! That's flat out amazing. The only other TD's were a pick 6 and a kick return. In their last 4 wins MIA has scored at most 17 points. Their defense is playing superb and winning them games. People that say Brett is playing very well right now are silly. People that say Miami's O is the reason for their current win streak are just as silly.
That does not change the fact that Chad out performs Brett week in and week out every since the Arizona game. Brett has 21 TD - but 6 of them were against one team. So aside from the Arizona game he has managed 15 TDs to 17 INTs. That is a sad stat.
A poor excuse? It was a catchable ball that should have been caught and Coles has had too many drops this year.
Every QB has drops, what about all the open receivers he missed w/ inaccurate passes yesterday? Those get overlloked?
Oh now I gotcha, I guess I should be more aware of the thread I am posting in. I'm not defending Favre, he missed a bunch of open receivers and threw another mindless interception, he has been bad for three straight weeks. The first INT was on Coles though, that was a ball that should have been caught, it was unlucky that it was picked off, it should have been just a drop but Coles needs to catch that ball. It changed the momentum, we were heading for a blowout win until that play.
I think the first INT was just bad luck, it was slioghtly behind Coles. he could have caught it but it was not an easy catch then we got the unlucky bounce. I don't blame Favre or Coles on that, it was just bad luck.
Did you seriously write that? What I wrote was not a joke and I thought it was pretty clear what my post was about. In December 2007 you wrote that Coles is getting old and beat up and that the Jets should explore trade opportunities. Now in December 2008 you are telling us Coles is a top receiver. This all ties into your Pennington fixation . . . I don't need to go further. Everyone knows what you did and you are simply being difficult here to annoy people.
I don't get your post here but are you saying that you don't count the 2nd NE game because we would have won the 1st game without him? HOW? We ran 3 straight times at the goalline and didn't get in. HOW is that his fault??? Or do you mean something else, I'm confused.
I'd say go back to packer-chatters but they dont want to hear how great favre is anymore either. Yet you and other pretend Jets fans keep the endless commercial about how Favre never does anything but good running 24/7. BTW favre groupies - Matt Cassel lost his father and went to Oakland and did the exact same thing Farve did after he lost his father and played oakland. His only mistake was it wasn't on Monday Night Football.
What don't you understand about their D allowing ZERO TD's in the last 3 games. Even with your agenda and being a Chadosexual can admit that the first INT is purely a fluke, bouncing off someone's heel. So lets say the second INT "put this defense in a bad spot" - starting field position at the 50. Then how do you explain the rest of the game? Allowing 27 points against a team that scored SIX points in the last two games. The Dolphins have won the the last three games because their defense is awesome. Allowing a total of I think 12 points in the last two games. But you never address points like that, you go on to some other random point that has nothing to do with anything. The Jets beat the Bills 31-27, the Phins beat them 16-3. Do you not see the difference? We have Favre, your dreams having Chad are over. Get on board and complain about losing out on Chad in the off season. Please. If the Dolphins get beat down by the Jets in two weeks, will you finally admit you were wrong about Favre?
If he is a "Chadsexual" then you are a TransgenderFarvesexual". I doubt junc is posting how great Chad is on the phins message board.
How am I a Favre fan? Your irrational. I admit Favre isn't doing that great but I'm not going to pin every mistake this team makes on him like you. Oh let me guess, you measure fanhood by amount of posts on GangGreen. You some how said the defense "won" the game for us against the Bills. We allowed 27 points against a team that scored SIX points in two games. SIX points. JP Losman. Dick Jauron. SIX POINTS. 24 points is MORE than enough to win against the Bills. AND you stated that we won on Sunday in "spite" of Favre????????????????? Be SOMEWHAT objective.
I don't even know what the Phins board thing means but you and Junc should get together and one of you can pretend to be Chad in some kind of weird sexual fantasy. How retarded of a fanbase do we have when there are fans crying about being 9-5 on top of hte division. And they can't get over a QB playing IN OUR F'n division. You should hate him while he's on the Phins. He's your enemy.
